Back in the 1990s the U.S. began a housing subsidy program for poor families. It gave poor families a chance to move out of slums and into nicer neighboorhoods. The hope was that the families would be given all of the economic opportunities easily found in richer areas. The theory didn't work to well, but it did impove one thing for the poor, it made them happier.
From the
New York Times, writer Sabrina Tavernise
looks into the surprising results of the housing subsidy program.
What researchers did find were substantial improvements in the physical and
mental health of the people who moved. Researchers
reported last year in The New England Journal of Medicine that the participants who moved to new neighborhoods had lower rates of
obesity and
diabetes
than those not offered the chance to move. Beyond the increase in
happiness, the new study found lower levels of depression among those
who moved.
“Mental health and subjective well-being are very important,” said
William Julius Wilson, a sociology professor at Harvard whose 1987 book
“The Truly Disadvantaged” pioneered theory about concentrated poverty.
“If you are not feeling well, it’s going to affect everything — your
employment, relations with your family.”
The researchers measured quality of life using participants’ reports of
their own well-being. Researchers asked: “Taken all together, how would
you say things are these days? Would you say you are very happy, pretty
happy or not too happy?”
A year after they entered the program, the families who had made the
move were living in neighborhoods where about a third of the residents
lived in poverty. In contrast, those who were not offered the chance to
move lived in neighborhoods where half of the residents lived in
poverty.
Professor Wilson said it was not surprising that education levels did
not change significantly because many of the children who moved remained
in the same school districts. And Lawrence Katz, an economics professor
at Harvard and one of the study authors, said that the preference for
educated workers was so strong that changing neighborhoods did not do
much to improve job options for the participants, who were mostly
African-American women without college educations.