Thursday, January 17, 2008

Poverty activists hold politicians’ feet to fire

from The Independent

A grassroots movement of anti-poverty campaigners has pushed inequality up the political agenda

by Ray Yurkowski and Eoin Callan
The Independent

Hundreds of families in Northumberland confront what, for them, is a daily struggle – if not for survival then at least for dignity. And their troubles unfold mostly out of sight, in barren apartments, soulless shelters or overflowing trailers.

Helping low-income people is not just a county problem. The provincial government is looking for ways to cut poverty across Ontario. In the provincial throne speech following the election, the government launched a cabinet committee to tackle poverty reduction and a series of steps to tackle inequality, including an increase in the minimum wage and full-time spaces for children in junior and senior kindergarten, to help cut childcare costs. Northumberland-Quinte West MPP Lou Rinaldi, who was appointed to the committee, said it will be working with the public, private and volunteer sectors to develop a plan to reduce poverty in Ontario. Their report is expected in the fall.

“I would hope we could identify a priority scale of issues,” Mr. Rinaldi said.

A new countywide committee started by local poverty activists has also been struck. Fifteen people, including a representative from Mr. Rinaldi’s office, became members of the new committee after the Northumberland Legal Centre hosted a justice forum on poverty last fall.

“The county and United Way have jumped on our bandwagon to form the poverty reduction committee,” said Deb O’Connor of the NLC and Northumberland Coalition Against Poverty. “And being a social justice organization, this is something that we are very pleased to spearhead.”

The activist said the government committee is a “reason for hope” but adds it is unlikely to go “far enough, fast enough.”

“That’s why it’s important that local committees like ours get formed,” said Ms. O’Connor. “Because we will keep the heat on the government to do better.”

On a local level, Ms. O’Connor says she expects the countywide committee “to play a major role in developing poverty reduction in Northumberland.”

The county council took a step in this direction last month when it approved 21 low-cost apartments for Cobourg and Colborne, the first new Northumberland social housing project in more than 10 years.

The decision was greeted by applause. But Mary Anne Rowlands, chair of the Northumberland Affordable Housing Steering Committee, said the affordable housing units being planned were not enough to meet the need.

Ms. O’Connor said one of the most exciting recent developments was Mr. Rinaldi’s appointment to the cabinet committee. Her hope is the local MPP will influence the way rural poverty is viewed.

Mr. Rinaldi said there was no “magic bullet” for eliminating poverty, adding he had posed the question to actvists “point blank” about “what it takes to do away with poverty.”

“I don’t think any of us has that answer,” he added.

“That’s surprising,” said Ms. O’Connor. “The Coalition Against Poverty has been campaigning for three years on a platform to raise the welfare rates, increase the minimum wage and build affordable housing.

“There shouldn’t be any confusion about that, there’s been a campaign throughout the province and those are the same three issues when I started doing this work in the 80s.

“We need a $10 minimum wage now, not two years from now, and the welfare rates need to be increased 40 per cent to bring them back to where they were before the Mike Harris cutbacks.”

After a nine-year freeze, the Ontario Disability Support Program and Ontario Works rates were increased by five per cent over the last four years and another two per cent in November.

“A single person on welfare receives $558 a month,” Ms. O’Connor explained. “No sane person would tell you that that’s enough to sustain your life.”

Mr. Rinaldi strayed from the Liberal’s party line in an interview with The Independent, saying he “personally” supported an increase in assistance payments “absolutely”.

But he said the focus of the spring budget would be providing initial funds to back up the party’s campaign pledges to increase the minimum wage and free up childcare spaces.

Ms. O’Connor said: “We are very hopeful the province is going to do meaningful poverty reduction.”

2 comments:

14allall41 said...

I believe the only way to stop workers from treating their clients so abusively is ....
1. Record all phone conversations, it's okay for them to record you, I'm sure you've heard this "Your call is being monitored for
2. Take someone with you as a witness whenever you have a meeting with your worker,a friend is all you need and they cannot say no to this.
3. It should be mandatory that anyone who works with the public, take an intense people skills course and not just once but throughout the duration of their employment.
4. I saved the best for last.
There is a special task force which investigates the police, so why not do the same for other agencies i.e.
When a worker needs to see a new client send in a substitute, if the worker is treating a client badly they will be caught red handed. When workers become aware of this new tactic, I'm sure they will treat their clients with the utmo

Unknown said...

Media Release

The Evidence Is In

Poverty’s Smoke and Mirrors, Part 2

To see part 1 http://www.special-need-child-canada.com/povertys-smoke-and-mirrors.html

The article above went out to the main media and approximately 65 other print news media starting September 21 2008. It was also put on the World Wide Web.

To my knowledge it was only printed in 3 Ontario news papers in the Letters to the Editor section.
1) Hamilton’s, Mountain News
2) Hamilton’s, Stoney Creek News
3) London’s, The London Free Press

Thank you to these three papers for caring enough about people that live in poverty to print this article.

As of today November 06 2008 the Ontario government has only posted old outdated directives dated Sept 2001.
http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/mcss/english/pillars/social/directives/ow_policy_directives.html

Obviously these directives are of no use to anyone simply because of the fact they are outdated and the ministry is now using the July 2008 up to date directives but has not shared them with the public.

You may remember Welfare Legal was so offended by this abuse we offered $100.00 to anyone that could produce a copy of the latest Ontario Works directive 7.4.

As of this date no one has collected the $100.00. Welfare Legal now has a copy of the new directives that the government has not shared.

We take the position that this is the most serious kind of abuse by our government to implement new policies but not allow those most in need to have access to them. The only reason the government has given for this abuse is that the Ontario Government has not prepared a French version of these directives.

This is a Human Rights violation, among others, to implement a secrete version of the directives and not share them with the public and not to have a French version available.

As we have stated before the Ontario government has in fact been cutting the benefits of Ontario Works, (OW) and the Ontario Disability Support Program, (ODSP) recipients without letting the general public aware of these cuts.

The latest cuts that have become public are the cuts to benefits to grandparents that are caring for their own grandchildren, who many had, have been apprehended by the Children’s Aid Society (CAS). The grand parent’s complaints were heard loud and clear the government seems to have withdrawn these policy changes.

The new directive 7.4 and others shows more cuts that the public is not aware of yet.

One of these cuts shows that the Ontario government no longer supports volunteering here in Ontario. In the old outdated directives dated September 2001, the government used to give a small benefit to those recipients that had to do volunteer work as a condition of eligibility for OW. These cuts also affect those who wish to do volunteer work and are disabled on ODSP as well.
Are volunteers no longer needed here in Ontario?

These cuts which are ongoing, have been made to help pay for the meager increases to OW and ODSP of 2%. They are also part of the government’s bigger plan, to upload the cost of OW and ODSP from the municipality to the province and to pay for its poverty reduction strategy.

At the end of the day the government will save millions of dollars in benefits that the former Mike Harris Tories said people on OW and ODSP were entitled to. Does this make sense to anyone?

This story gets much, much worse. It turns out that the aboriginal community in Ontario had the foresight not to allow its members to be subjected to the policies and procedures put in place by the Mike Harris government, when they bought the draconian computer program from Anderson Consulting now Accenture. The cost of that program was $400 million and rising. This program was designed to cut people off of benefits automatically, with no human contact. There seems to be 2 classes of people being governed differently here, and what are the costs?

It would seem they were allowed to have their own computer program made up by a private company called AD Morrison.
http://www.admorrison.com/

A private professional researcher contacted Welfare Legal in an attempt to collect the $100.00 offered for the latest Ontario Works directive 7.4 and alerted us to a Pandora’s Box. You will see on the home page of AD Morrison’s site there is a link to “Latest Directives”. This link contained a third set of OW directives that was not available to the general public.

After Welfare Legal contacted the ministry to see if this in fact was the latest and new directive 7.4, the ministry contacted us with a reply that had nothing to do with our request. Then out of the blue this link was taken of the site.

After gathering all the evidence we soon learned that the Ontario government had not been keeping these new directive from the public since July 2008, they had in fact been hiding them starting in December 2005 and no one new about it. At least no one that has come forward so far.

There has been no response from any legal clinic or private paralegal in Ontario showing that they new about this breach of the Human Rights Code by our provincial government. If anyone was aware of this why didn’t they take it to the media? Does nobody care about this abuse? Does nobody care about eliminating poverty?

It is interesting to note that the government has even changed the directive numbers to confuse us even more once we were allowed to become aware of them.

September 2001 shows directive 31.0, the out dated benefits that we all are aware of.

December 2005 shows
7.3 is EMPLOYMENT AND PARTICIPATION BENEFITS
7.4 is COMMUNITY START UP AND MAINTENANCE BENEFIT

July 2008 shows
7.4 is EMPLOYMENT AND PARTICIPATION BENEFITS
7.5 is COMMUNITY START UP AND MAINTENANCE BENEFIT

For a copy of these directives
http://owcorruption.blogspot.com/

How can the Ontario government say it is attempting to alleviate poverty when it is secretly cutting the benefits of those most in need? (Reverse Robin Hood)

Ron Payne
Welfare Legal
Hamilton, Ontario
Phone 905-253-0205
E-mail welfarelegal2004@hotmail.com
Blog http://welfarelegal.blogspot.com/